Pro‑Choice Is Not Pro‑Death
I grew up in a Catholic household where being “pro‑life” was a core belief. Like many people, I was taught that being pro‑choice meant supporting the murder of babies.
That is not what being pro‑choice means.
Being pro‑choice means believing that women deserve the right to make medical decisions about their own bodies without government interference. It is about bodily autonomy, privacy, and access to healthcare — not about promoting harm.
Roe v. Wade and the Constitutional Right to Privacy
In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, establishing that the Constitution protected a woman’s right to choose an abortion under the right to privacy.
That ruling stood for nearly 50 years.
In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, returning abortion regulation to the states. The decision fundamentally changed access to reproductive healthcare across the country.
(Background on Roe and its legal impact can be found via the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and constitutional law analyses.)
What Science Says About Early Pregnancy
A major dividing point in the abortion debate is when a pregnancy should be considered a person.
From a medical standpoint:
A fertilized egg is called a zygote
It develops into a morula
Then into a blastocyst
It becomes an embryo
Around 10 weeks, it is medically termed a fetus
These distinctions are based on embryology and developmental biology — not theology.
According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), abortion is a medical procedure and is considered healthcare.
Source: https://www.acog.org/advocacy/facts-are-important/abortion-is-healthcare
Medical science also notes that 10–20% of known pregnancies end in miscarriage, often due to chromosomal abnormalities — and many more occur before a person even realizes they are pregnant.
Miscarriage is not murder. It is a biological reality.
Abortion and Medical Care After Sexual Assault
Sexual assault remains a serious issue in the United States. According to data from the Department of Justice and public health organizations, sexual violence affects millions of women over their lifetimes.
Access to emergency contraception (such as Plan B) and abortion care is considered essential healthcare for survivors of sexual assault.
Emergency contraception prevents ovulation or fertilization — it does not terminate an established pregnancy.
The right to seek medical care after assault should not be politicized.
The Medical Reality of Miscarriage and Abortion Care
When a miscarriage occurs, some women require a medical procedure (such as dilation and curettage, or medication management) to remove nonviable tissue from the uterus.
The same procedures used in abortion care are also used to treat miscarriages and prevent infection or sepsis.
Restricting abortion access has, in documented cases, delayed care for women experiencing medical emergencies.
Project 2026 and Fetal Personhood Debates
Policy discussions referenced in publications such as Ms. Magazine have examined proposals associated with conservative policy groups sometimes referred to as “Project 2026,” which include expanding fetal personhood definitions.
The legal question of fetal personhood is central because defining a fetus as a legal person could significantly alter criminal law, healthcare access, IVF treatment, and miscarriage management.
These debates are ongoing at both state and federal levels.
Bodily Autonomy and Equal Protection
At its core, the pro‑choice position is about bodily autonomy.
No other medical condition requires the government to mandate that a person use their body to sustain another life against their will.
Supporters of reproductive rights argue that:
Women deserve equal protection under the law
Healthcare decisions belong between patients and doctors
Religious beliefs should not dictate medical policy in a pluralistic society
The question is not whether someone personally supports abortion. The question is whether the government should compel pregnancy.
Conclusion: Why I Am Pro‑Choice
I am pro‑choice because:
- I believe in medical science.
- I believe in separation of church and state.
- I believe victims of violence deserve healthcare.
- I believe miscarriage is not a crime.
- I believe women deserve autonomy over their own bodies.
- Being pro‑choice does not require anyone to have an abortion.
It requires believing that the choice belongs to the individual — not the government.
Sources
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: https://www.acog.org/advocacy/facts-are-important/abortion-is-healthcare
Ms. Magazine on Project 2026 and women’s rights:https://msmagazine.com/2025/12/13/project-2026-heritage-foundation-womens-rights-childcare-education-department-abortion/
Legal background on Roe v. Wade: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+rights+did+roe+vs+wade+lead+to+for+women
U.S. Department of Justice crime data (sexual violence statistics)
CDC data on miscarriage rates
Transparency & Editorial Standards
This article is an opinion piece reflecting the author’s personal beliefs and lived experiences. Medical definitions are based on standard embryology terminology and guidance from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).
Statistics regarding miscarriage and sexual assault are derived from publicly available federal data and peer‑reviewed public health research.
Policy references regarding “Project 2026” are based on published reporting and advocacy analysis. Readers are encouraged to review primary source documents and legislative texts directly for full context.
0 comments